NBI Exec says Duterte threatened Marcos at least six times, tells Impeachment Court

on

MANILA, Philippines— An official of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) testified on the fourth day of Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial Monday that Duterte publicly threatened President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at least six times, with the repeated statements meeting the elements of the crime of grave threats under Philippine law.

Jeremy Lotoc, NBI regional director for the National Capital Region and one of the lead investigators in the bureau’s probe of Duterte’s alleged assassination remarks, took the witness stand for the House prosecution panel to bolster Article IV of the Articles of Impeachment, which accuses the Vice President of making grave threats against President Marcos, First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez.

Under questioning by prosecutors, Lotoc testified that the NBI documented at least six separate occasions in which Duterte made statements threatening the President’s life. He said investigators concluded that the repeated declarations were not mere expressions of anger or political rhetoric but constituted threats punishable under the Revised Penal Code.

The prosecution sought to establish that the alleged threats formed a continuing pattern of conduct rather than an isolated remark, arguing that Duterte repeatedly expressed an intention to have President Marcos killed under certain circumstances.

The NBI official also explained the bureau’s investigation into Duterte’s controversial statement that she had contracted someone to kill the President, the First Lady, and Romualdez should she herself be assassinated. Prosecutors used his testimony to argue that the statements were serious enough to warrant a criminal investigation and were relevant to determining whether Duterte committed betrayal of public trust and other impeachable offenses.

The defense is expected to challenge the NBI’s conclusions during cross-examination, maintaining its position that Duterte’s statements have been taken out of context and should not be construed as criminal threats or grounds for impeachment.

The Senate impeachment court is hearing Article IV of the impeachment complaint before proceeding to the remaining articles endorsed by the House of Representatives.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading