In the ongoing geopolitical struggle over the West Philippine Sea (WPS), the tension between conservation efforts and sovereignty issues has become a focal point of contention. The Philippine government and China have been at odds overfishing rights and environmental regulations, which are often seen as veiled assertions of territorial claims.
China’s Fishing Ban and the Philippines’ Response
China’s imposition of an annual fishing ban in parts of the South China Sea, including areas within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone (EEZ), has sparked significant controversy. The ban, which China claims is aimed at conserving marine resources, is viewed by the Philippines as an infringement on its sovereignty. The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) of the Philippines has consistently rejected this ban, labeling it as an “illegal exercise of state authority” that encroaches on the country’s maritime zones .
The fishing ban, typically enforced from May to August, extends far beyond China’s legitimate maritime entitlements under international law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The DFA argues that this ban is baseless and undermines the 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which invalidated China’s expansive claims over the South China Sea and affirmed the Philippines’ sovereign rights over its EEZ.
Joint Maritime Patrols and Military Presence
In response to China’s assertive actions, the Philippines has ramped up its defense and security measures, including conducting joint maritime patrols with allies such as the United States. National Security Adviser Eduardo Año emphasized the importance of these patrols as part of the longstanding defense cooperation between the Philippines and the US, aimed at ensuring security and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region.
These patrols, which have involved ships and aircraft from both nations’ military forces, are not explicitly targeted at any particular country but serve as a clear signal of the Philippines’ commitment to defending its territorial integrity. The increased military presence is also a response to the persistent sightings of Chinese maritime militia vessels in Philippine waters, which have led to numerous diplomatic protests from Manila .
The Impact on Filipino Fishermen
The geopolitical struggle has had tangible effects on the livelihoods of Filipino fishermen. Reports of harassment and intimidation by Chinese vessels have been common, disrupting the fishing activities that are crucial for local communities. The Philippine government has called on China to take active measures to prevent its fishing fleets from entering Philippine territorial waters and has pledged to enforce laws against illegal fishing activities.
In a statement, the DFA highlighted that the fishing ban not only violates the Philippines’ sovereignty but also breaches the traditional and legitimate fishing rights of Filipino fishermen, as upheld by the 2016 arbitration ruling. This situation has led to a complex interplay of environmental conservation and national sovereignty, where measures ostensibly aimed at protecting marine life are perceived as strategies to assert control over disputed waters.
International Reactions and Diplomacy
The international community has also weighed in on the issue. The US has reiterated its support for the Philippines, emphasizing the need for a rules-based order in the South China Sea. This stance aligns with broader efforts to counter China’s maritime claims and ensure freedom of navigation in one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.
China, on the other hand, has continued to reject the 2016 arbitration ruling and maintains its claim over nearly 90% of the South China Sea, citing historical rights. This position has not only strained relations with the Philippines but also with other claimant states such as Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan, all of which have overlapping claims in the resource-rich waters.
Conclusion
The conflict over the West Philippine Sea highlights the intricate balance between environmental conservation and national sovereignty. While China frames its fishing ban as an ecological necessity, the Philippines and its allies view it as a strategic maneuver to bolster territorial claims. As diplomatic and military activities intensify, the need for a nuanced and multi-faceted approach to resolve these disputes becomes ever more critical. The international community’s role in upholding maritime law and supporting affected nations like the Philippines will be pivotal in shaping the future of this contested region.
4o
