China releases land survey making claim over Japan-administered islands

on

Tensions between China and Japan is expected to worsen as China released a land survey showing its claim over the Japanese-administered Senkaku Islands.

Tokyo’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Katsunobu Kato said Tuesday that the release of a Chinese topographical map that has Chinese names for the islands’ geological formations does not mean the islands belong to China, Japanese media reported.

“The Senkaku Islands are unquestionably our nation’s unique territory, both historically and under international law,” Kato said. “Even if China surveys and publishes about the Senkaku Islands and surrounding areas, this doesn’t change.”

On Monday, the Chinese government posted online high-resolution maps, photos and surveys of the islands, which officially are called the Diaoyutai or Diaoyu Islands in China.

“The report … supplements and improves the basic geographic data of the Diaoyu Islands and its affiliated islands, and provides important support for the management of the Diaoyu Islands’ resources and environmental protection,” the natural resources ministry said, according to the South China Morning Post.

The ministry’s map labeled the highest peak in the island chain Gaohua Peak. The peak is the highest above sea level at 362 meters. The second-highest in the chain was labeled Shennong Peak, at 320 meters above sea level.

Chinese news agency Xinhua said Tuesday that the data is being provided to “help the international community further understand the indisputable fact that the Diaoyu Island and its affiliated islands are China’s inherent territory.”

Tensions between Japan and China have risen since China enacted a law in February that permits Beijing’s coast guard to use firepower against boats that enter Chinese-claimed waters.

Tokyo said in February that armed Chinese vessels had entered Japanese territorial waters.

The Biden administration recently reaffirmed U.S. commitment to a bilateral treaty with Japan. The defense pact applies to the Senkakus in the event of an attack, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said in January.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading