Duterte asks anti-communist task force to stop impeding community pantries

on

President Rodrigo Duterte on Tuesday asked the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) to stop making statements linking organizers of community pantries to the communist movement.

“I think the President has spoken through my office. The DILG (Department of Interior and Local Government) has spoken. Unless their concern is about health protocols being observed, they should leave these community pantries alone,” Presidential spokesman Harry Roque said in a virtual presser on Tuesday.

He noted that DILG Secretary Eduardo Año himself ordered police and local government officials not to interfere with operations of community pantries.

In a statement, Año said police and LGU interference should only be limited to ensuring that minimum health protocols are observed.

Año also denied allegations that his agency ordered police to look into community pantries across the country.

For his part, NTF-ELCAC spokesperson Lt. Gen. Antonio Parlade Jr. has denied red-tagging community pantry organizers but admitted that they are checking their backgrounds.

Parlade, however, expressed concern over how organizers of community pantries seem to be spreading “propaganda” about the government’s failure to address people’s needs.

Nonetheless, Duterte praised Filipinos who have organized community pantries across the country, as they are helping those affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, Malacañang said Tuesday.

Roque also reiterated that community pantries exemplify the best of the Filipino character in times of challenges.

“On the side of the President and the DILG, we are encouraging and praising citizens joining the work of community pantries,” he said in Filipino. “Our President really praises this initiative.”


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading