Most Covid vaccine recipients in US report no side effects

on

The vaccine for the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) has so far caused no severe side effects among most of those who received it in the United States.

According to data released Friday by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), People who receive vaccine for the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) report shot-related side effects at a rate of roughly one for every 2,000 doses, with more than 90 percent classified as “non-serious.”

Headaches were the most common side effect, followed by fatigue and dizziness, the data showed.

Although 113 deaths were reported following receipt of the vaccine, none were found to be related to the shot, the agency said. About 65 percent were among residents of nursing homes.

The findings are based on the first 13.8 million doses of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines administered in the United States between Dec. 14 and Jan. 13, according to the CDC.

Fewer than 7,000 side effects were reported with both vaccines, which require two doses and were approved for use in mid-December.

“Healthcare providers and vaccine recipients can be reassured about the safety of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines,” the CDC researchers wrote.

“Counseling vaccine recipients to expect [non-serious] reactions might ease concerns and encourage completion of the two-dose vaccination series,” they said.

Less than 10 percent of the side effects reported were considered serious or life-threatening, a figure that includes fewer than 100 cases of anaphylaxis, or a severe allergic reaction, reported with both vaccines, according to the CDC.

Of the non-serious side effects, 22 percent involved headaches, 17 percent were cases of fatigue and 17 percent included reports of dizziness, the CDC said.

MORE VALIDATION FROM FOLLOW-UP SURVEY

A follow-up survey of more than 1.6 million vaccine recipients revealed that more than 70 percent experienced injection-site pain following administration of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna shots, the data showed.

Roughly one-third of recipients reported fever and 30 percent indicated they suffered headaches within seven days of receiving either vaccine, the CDC said.

Nearly 80 percent of the survey respondents said they experienced injection-site pain after receiving their second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, while 54 percent reorted fatigue, 47 percent had muscle pain and 43 percent suffered from headaches.

These numbers were much higher following receipt of the second dose of the vaccine than the first, but all were considered non-serious, the CDC said.

Information on second-dose side effects for the Moderna vaccine was not available, as they had yet to be administered prior to the Jan. 13 close of the study period, according to the agency.

However, rates of side effects following administration of the first dose were similar for both vaccines, the data showed.

Doses of the Moderna vaccine are administered 28 days apart and the product was approved for use on Dec. 18, the agency said.

The two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which was approved on Dec. 11, are given 21 days apart.

 

 


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading