Members of LGBT community at higher risk for severe Covid

on

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender adults are more likely to suffer from several chronic health conditions that place them at increased risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), according to data released on Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Among the conditions linked to risk for more severe illness more common among LGBT adults are asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, diabetes and high blood pressure.

The agency recommends that more data on sexual orientation and gender identity be included with Covid-19 surveillance to improve treatment in LGBT patients.

“The higher prevalence of conditions like heart disease, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and diabetes in those who identify as gay, lesbian or bisexual compared to those who identify as heterosexual is not surprising when considering the impacts of discrimination and stigma [on this population],” Dr. Kacie Kidd, who has researched LGBT health disparities.

Nearly 20 percent of those the CDC classifies as “sexual minorities” age 18 and older have a history of asthma, compared to 14 percent of people who identify as “heterosexual,” the data showed.

In addition, just over 10 percent of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender adults have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, while 7 percent of heterosexual adults have the breathing disorder.

Rates of heart disease – 8 percent versus 7 percent – as well as diabetes – 13 percent versus 12 percent – and high blood pressure  – 36 percent versus 34 percent – are also slightly higher among LGBT adults in the United States compared to their heterosexual peers, according to the agency.

Discrimination and stigma are associated with disparities “that are likely to worsen the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic for this population, including higher rates of unstable housing and unemployment,” said Kidd, a specialist in adolescent and young adult medicine at UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh. She was not part of the CDC analysis.

‘SEXUAL MINORITY FINDINGS’

“Sexual minority” adults who also are members of racial and ethnic minority groups “disproportionately affected by the pandemic” have higher rates of several health conditions than their heterosexual peers, according to the CDC.

For example, 45 percent of black LGBT adults in the United States have high blood pressure, compared to 35 percent of white LGBT and 32 percent of white heterosexual adults, the CDC data showed.

And, 19 percent of black LGBT adults nationally have diabetes, compared to 11 percent of white LGBT and 10 percent of white heterosexual adults, the agency said.

LGBT adults of all racial and ethnic backgrounds also have higher rates of cancer, obesity and kidney disease, compared to their heterosexual peers, according to the CDC – which may also place them at higher risk for severe Covid-19.

Smokers also are believed to be at higher risk for serious illness from the virus, and 22 percent of LGBT adults in the United States smoke, compared to 15 percent of heterosexual adults, the data showed.

Based on these findings, the CDC is urging for the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity data in Covid-19 surveillance in order to “improve knowledge about disparities in infections and adverse outcomes.”

Having this information would enable “more equitable responses to the pandemic,” the agency said, and Kidd agreed.

“Including validated questions about sexual orientation and gender identity in national surveys as proposed by these authors is critically important to understand the prevalence of the LGBTQ population and the disparities they face,” she said.

“Doing so is the only way to know how to best allocate resources and equip researchers and health systems with the means to ultimately reduce and eliminate these disparities moving forward, something that is even more important during a compounding health crisis like the Covid-19 pandemic.”


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading