WHO acknowledges evidence that coronavirus transmission can be airborne

on

CDDE72B2-EC53-433C-A913-BD7585C3D41C

The World Health Organization (WHO) has acknowledged there is emerging evidence that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be spread by tiny particles suspended in the air.

With this, the WHO has released an updated guidance on  the role of airborne droplets in transmission of COVID-19.

The airborne transmission could not be ruled out in crowded, closed or poorly ventilated settings, a WHO official said.

If the evidence is confirmed, it may affect guidelines for indoor spaces.

However, WHO officials have cautioned the evidence is preliminary and requires further assessment.

Benedetta Allegranzi, the WHO’s technical lead for infection prevention and control, said that evidence emerging of airborne transmission of the coronavirus in “crowded, closed, poorly ventilated settings that have been described, cannot be ruled out”.

An open letter from more than 200 scientists had accused the WHO of underestimating the possibility of airborne transmission.

The WHO has so far said that the virus is transmitted through droplets when people cough or sneeze.

“We wanted them to acknowledge the evidence,” Jose Jimenez, a chemist at the University of Colorado who signed the paper, told the Reuters news agency.

“This is definitely not an attack on the WHO. It’s a scientific debate, but we felt we needed to go public because they were refusing to hear the evidence after many conversations with them,” he said.

Another signatory – Professor Benjamin Cowling of Hong Kong University – told the BBC the finding had “important implications”.

“In healthcare settings, if aerosol transmission poses a risk then we understand healthcare workers should really be wearing the best possible preventive equipment… and actually the World Health Organization said that one of the reasons they were not keen to talk about aerosol transmission of Covid-19 is because there’s not a sufficient number of these kind of specialised masks for many parts of the world,” he said.

“And in the community, if we’re thinking about aerosol transmission being a particular risk, then we need to think about how to prevent larger super spreading events, larger outbreaks and those occur in indoor environments with poor ventilation, with crowding and with prolonged close contact.”

For months, the WHO has insisted that Covid-19 is transmitted via droplets emitted when people cough or sneeze.

Droplets that do not linger in the air, but fall onto surfaces – that’s why handwashing has been identified as a key prevention measure.

But 239 scientists from 32 countries don’t agree: they say there is also strong evidence to suggest the virus can also spread in the air: through much tinier particles that float around for hours after people talk, or breathe out.

On the other hand, today,  the WHO admitted there was evidence to suggest this was possible in specific settings, such as enclosed and crowded spaces.

That evidence will have to be thoroughly evaluated, but if it is confirmed, the advice on how to prevent the virus spreading may have to change, and could lead to more widespread use of masks, and more rigorous distancing, especially in bars, restaurants, and on public transport.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has released updated guidance on the role of airborne droplets in transmission of COVID-19, but the institution’s stance on the topic remains largely unchanged.

Airborne transmission means that the illness might have the potential to spread through particles known as aerosols, which can hover in the air after a person has left the area.

In the new guidance, released Thursday (July 9), WHO said that airborne transmission of COVID-19 in crowded, indoor locations with poor ventilation “cannot be ruled out.”

Previously, WHO said that airborne transmission of the new coronavirus was a concern only in hospital settings during certain medical procedures, such as when a patient is being intubated with a breathing tube.

Some reports of outbreaks occurring in restaurants,  Choir practice and fitness classes have suggested the possibility of airborne transmission, the WHO conceded.

But critically, WHO said that other forms of transmission, such as transmission through larger droplets released in coughs and sneezes and via contaminated surfaces, could still explain these clusters.

The guidance also reviews evidence for airborne transmission in laboratory settings, but notes that these lab conditions don’t necessarily reflect the real word.  /Stacy Ang with reports from BBC 


Discover more from Current PH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Tama ba o Hindi Ang pagpalit sa Senate president...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ih9yU2ytu8A closer look at the 1987 Constitution suggests that the requirement may not be a fixed absolute majority of 13 senators. The constitutional phrase...

Let us Free Ourselves from family dynasties of plunderers

Since 2025, when news of the staggering 1-trillion-peso large-scale theft came to public consciousness, many of us weren't surprised. At the back of our minds,...

A Perfect Storm Gathers on June 12 Independence Day:...

There are moments in a nation’s history when seemingly unrelated events begin moving toward the same point. Political rivals who despise each other suddenly find themselves attacking the same government. Economic pressures begin piling up on top of political grievances. Public trust erodes while institutions struggle to maintain authority. What appears at first to be a series of isolated developments gradually reveals itself as a single, larger crisis.

Cayetano-Marcos-Marcoleta June 4 show sa Senado: ano tingin ng...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0r2sD_UJ-T4🇵🇭 Currentph News TV — Real News. Real Talk. Real Impact. Welcome to Currentph TV, the digital news and public affairs channel built for the...

Crisis at the Philippine Senate: National Security Risks and...

A crisis has once again engulfed the Philippine Senate. The declaration of vacancies in all leadership positions and the installation of Senator Sherwin Gatchalian...

Discover more from Current PH

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current PH

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading