Lapu-Lapu solon wants Lapu-Lapu identified as hero, not fish

on

MANILA, Philippines — Lapu-Lapu was then a ruler of Mactan in the Visayas who resisted and defeated the Spaniards in the Battle of Mactan and with it the war hero should always be accorded and honor befitting a patriot, a great ruler and a hero no less.

But what instantly comes to mind to a lot of people is the fish called “lapu-lapu,” which is decidedly one of the priciest and tastiest seafood, and not that of the real Lapu-Lapu who is considered as one of the greatest Filipino war heroes.

To correct this, Lapu-Lapu City Rep. Paz Radaza filed House Bill 2223 or “An Act Rectifying the Dishonorable Use of a Great Filipino Name Lapu-Lapu to a Fish Species ‘Plectropomus leopardus.”

“The bill aims to rectify, correct and give justice to the honorable name of Lapu-Lapu as a hero,” Radaza said.

For Plectropomus leopardus to be known, named and promoted as a delicious delicacy, Radaza said Filipinos should be encouraged to call it “Pugapo” instead of “lapu-lapu.”

“It is inappropriate, a defilement, and a violation, even if the fish could be the most sought-after, not only in the Philippines but also in Southeast Asia,” Radaza said.

In yesteryears, Radaza said the fish Plectropomus leopardus was known in the regions of the Visayas and Mindanao as “Pugapo.”

“But nowadays, it is alarming that more and more Filipinos prefer to call it lapu-lapu, a disrespect to a patriotic Filipino forebear,” she said.

The bill further declares that as it is a defilement that his name is being used to call a fish, Plectropomus leopardus.

Calling the specie as Lapu-Lapu or Lapulapu shall now be prohibited.

The species shall instead be called and restored to its original name Pugapo, the bill provides.

The bill mandates the National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP), together with the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) of the Department of Agriculture (DA), to take the lead role in the implementation of the Act.

Likewise, the Philippine Information Agency (PIA) shall prepare advertisements and information campaign on the Act until full compliance is attained.

Local government units shall also help implement the Act by passing local ordinances and disseminating information within their areas of jurisdiction that “Pugapo” should not be called Lapu-Lapu. (Eddie Galvez/IAMIGO/CNS)


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Gelica Sandra Paulo
Gelica Sandra Paulo is a member of the Current News Service (CNS). As Content Producer, Paulo is responsible for writing daily stories on events happening around us. You can reach her at gelica.paulo@currentph.com.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading