Trump impeachment hearings to be televised: Will these be enough to defeat the President at the polls?

on

For the first time in American history, an American president will see himself not as the boss who fires erring applicants but as the one at the very center of a political maelstrom.

518FD387-CC2B-4702-9E54-53E41ADCF533Impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump are underway, beginning Wednesday. Trump has been quoted as saying that he wants the proceedings to be televised, a delicious request to the ears of the American media industry which has been a target of Trump attacks since his very first day in office.

Media analysts see the impeachment broadcasts as highly damaging not just to Trump, who seeks a second term, but to the Republican Party which, in recent days, had tried to block every attempt by Democrats to call for a probe on allegations against the embattled president.

Stephen Collison, writing for CNN, says that:

“The gravity and drama of the first televised impeachment hearings into Donald Trump’s presidency on Wednesday will imprint themselves on history and reverberate far from Washington.

The most crucial stage of the Ukraine investigation so far has profound implications beyond the political and personal reputation of Trump and the question of whether he abused his power by seeking political favors from a foreign power.

His fate will have sweeping consequences for the future understanding of powers vested within the presidency itself. The hearings will test whether the ancient machinery of US governance can effectively investigate a President who ignores the charges against him and fogs fact in defining a new post-truth political era. And notwithstanding Trump’s current Republican firewall, the hearings will begin to decide whether a presidency that has rocked America and the world will reach its full natural term.”

Many expect the Republicans no-vote on Trump’s impeachment, and that is a surety. However, such moves might influence voter behavior and lead to Trump’s defeat at the polls.

Trump is running against former Vice President Joe Biden whom he accused of using his position to help his son, Hunter, a more favorable job at a Ukrainian company. Biden has since denied Trump’s charge and Hunter, his son, has resigned and went as far away from the controversy as possible.

What has turned this Trump offensive into a very offensive one back at him is the account of a White House insider which portrayed the US President as ingratiating himself before an Ukrainian president just to get juicy information to smash his political opponent to smithereens. For Americans, this is clearly an abuse of power because it exposes the possibility of a president such as Trump using his vast connections for his political survival. An abuse of power, for Americans, happens when someone in power uses his position to gain advantage over another. Americans has always valued a good level playing field, not just in business, but in all aspects of life, particularly politics.

Trump has time and again, blocked, parlayed and slithered his way out of intrigues and scandals, even those about his liaisons with prostitutes and his totally inane and insane statements that causes shame and humiliate a lot of the American publics.

While these scenes would definitely imprint itself into the historical consciousness of the people, is it enough to defeat the highly controversial Trump? Trump is a celebrity, a believer of the dictum that “bad publicity is still publicity.”


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading