ICI will not be open for Public Hearings

on

The Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) has decided not to open its ongoing hearings to the public, a move that has stirred debate over transparency and accountability in the handling of major infrastructure projects.

In a statement released yesterday, the commission explained that the decision was made to ensure an “uninterrupted and focused process,” citing the sensitive nature of testimonies and documents being presented. According to the ICI, confidentiality is necessary at this stage to protect both witnesses and the integrity of the investigations.

“The Commission believes that restricting public access at this point will allow for a more candid exchange of information and a thorough evaluation of the facts,” the ICI said. It added that findings and recommendations would be made available in a comprehensive report once the hearings conclude.

However, the move quickly drew criticism from civil society groups, advocacy organizations, and several lawmakers, who argued that excluding the public only fuels suspicion and weakens trust. “If the commission is investigating matters of public interest, the proceedings should also be accessible to the people,” one transparency watchdog said.

Infrastructure projects under review involve billions of pesos in public funds, ranging from flood control systems and transportation networks to energy development. Given their national significance, stakeholders have called for full disclosure of the discussions and deliberations.

Supporters of the ICI’s decision contend that closed-door hearings are a common practice in investigative bodies worldwide, particularly when sensitive contracts, proprietary data, or security matters are involved. They emphasize that the final report will be subject to public scrutiny and legislative oversight.

Still, questions remain on whether the commission can balance confidentiality with the public’s right to know. With infrastructure spending forming a large portion of the national budget, critics insist that transparency is non-negotiable.

The ICI is expected to issue interim updates in the coming months, but the full findings will only be released at the conclusion of its investigation. Until then, debates over secrecy and accountability are likely to intensify.


Discover more from CurrentPh

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Marcos Jr. Should Fire His Agriculture Secretary Before Import...

Francisco Tiu Laurel's reliance on food imports is becoming harder to defend as inflation accelerates, the peso weakens and Filipino farmers struggle to earn a fair return. Senator Kiko Pangilinan's warnings deserve more than another government investigation.

The Philippines’ Next President May Have to Reckon With...

For decades, Philippine presidential elections have been contests among familiar political families, their allies, and the shifting coalitions that sustain them. Political parties change...

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

Discover more from CurrentPh

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading