Why I believe Bongbong Marcos will lose this elections

on

Former senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr might be at the top of the leaderboard when it comes to presidential aspirants for the May 2022 presidential elections now, but I believe that he will surely lose this elections. First, he is not an exciting candidate and in fact, suffers from a stale narrative and second, the political atmosphere being created for him to lose is already here slowly being created by sectors affected by the administration of his father. The tone of the forthcoming elections is turning out to be a struggle between the “strong arm” group represented by Bongbong Marcos and the “liberal democratic” group being promoted by no less than the Vice President turned presidential candidate Leni Robredo. There is a very strong perception being created of this strong arm group as heavily corrupted compared with the liberal democratic one.

Blame this to the error being committed by no less than the camp of Bongbong Marcos. They are allowing their political opponents to revive the narrative that actually caused the downfall of their family especially their patriarch, Ferdinand Marcos. Marcos fell from power due to charges of massive corruption, a charge not without its corresponding strong pieces of evidence.

Charges of massive corruption are now defining the Duterte Administration to the consternation of millions of Filipinos. What is now the prevailing and most popular belief is the charge that the only reason why Duterte and his minions are imposing strong arm tactics is for them to shield their nefarious corrupt practices by creating a climate of fear. This climate of fear hides the reality of a climate of impunity, not just against lives but of stealing and plundering the nation’s treasures and coffers. Duterte, according to millions of Filipinos, is not the leader he pretends to be but just a person who ascended to Malacanan on a false pretense and premise of change when in truth and in fact, Duterte is just a petty government executive whose brain cannot really comprehend the intricacies of the position he sought after in 2016. Worse, Duterte is feigning being tough when in truth and in fact, he is just a lackey of bigger economic interests controlled by foreign powers and their local stooges. These people only uses Duterte as their poster boy in their desire to raid the public coffers. Evidence? Well the Pharmally senate probe is one.

DUe to these massive charges of corruption. many people blame Duterte’s close associate Senator Christopher “Bong” Go, as the mastermind behind the Pharmally mess and others. Go has filed his candidacy for the vice presidency and what did Bongbong’s camp do? They opened themselves to the possibility of teaming up with Go who is now suffering a very serious reputattional damage due to his direct links with Michael Yang and Pharmally top management officials. Imagine the stupidity of the Marcos camp.

Bongbong would also lose this elections because he is being advised by people who does not know the dynamics of ground politics. Being endorsed by Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL) and Partido Federal meant nothing. These are shell organizations with no organized constituencies. That explains why Bongbong and several pro-Duterte allies are hoping to get the PDP-Laban because this is a political party heavy with local government support and is expected to be financed heavily by this administration.

If Bongbong does not change tack, he might lose heavily on this elections. This will end the dreams of the Marcos family to ascend once more the rungs of power. If Bongbong loses, the Marcos Family will be decimated politically. And if the family expects that they have an Imee or a Sandro as their secret aces–plueezz!Admit it–if BBM loses this opportunity, he will never be able to recover and most probably, go the way of former DILG secretary Mar Roxas who retired and is now enjoying the life of a civilian. This is a big possibility. Bongbong will lose this elections because he is a victim of a stale story and a discredited legacy.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading