Duterte defends hesitancy of PNP to share drug war info with CHR

on

President Rodrigo Duterte on Monday said he understands why the Philippine National Police (PNP) refused to share information to the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) regarding illegal drug-related killings.

In a pre-recorded public address, Duterte said the PNP wanted to keep case folders on the drug war “confidential” not because they are hiding anything but because these are “national security issues.”

Duterte said he personally did not get to see the PNP’s case folders and never asked for them because he was only concerned with results of police operations.

“They only tell me who they are but as to where they are and how they will be arrested, it’s none of my business really as President. That’s why I myself haven’t seen those records and I can understand when the military and police would withhold them, it’s not something you should know,” he said partly in Filipino.

Although he said some documents may be available to the public, he said confidential documents were kept under wraps for a reason.

“There are public documents that can be shown to the public at large and anybody who is interested can get it. But these confidential documents, you are not allowed to look at them,” he said partly in Filipino.

Duterte urged CHR to be “careful” in their assessment on human rights violations, noting that many cops were casualties in the drug war.

“Be careful in your evaluation and assessment. It’s not only the government that knows how to kill. The NPA and druglords also know how to kill,” he said partly in Filipino.

He, meanwhile, defended anew his aggressive crackdown on illegal drugs noting that cops would not shoot alleged drug coddlers if they did not fight back.

“It’s not that we’re killing all the bad people, but the good people, including my soldiers and cops are being killed and in numbers,” he said partly in Filipino.

Duterte said he would only protect cops who killed while in the line of duty, noting that he would never tolerate those who abused their power.

“They are not allowed to kill a man kneeling down or facing back. That’s illegal. But those facing you while carrying a gun, these drug coddlers, make them face police or military with training, they will surely die. And if you say there were intentionally killed, they were not. They fought back,” he said.

Duterte also warned the public against engaging in the illegal drug trade, noting that it could put their lives at risk.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading