People relying on TV, social media for Covid updates are less informed on virus

on

People who obtain their news about the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) from television and social media are less knowledgeable about the virus than those looking for other sources, according to the results of a survey published Monday by Current Medical Research & Opinion.

Compared to those who trust other sources, such as government websites, to provide them with accurate news about the pandemic, respondents who relied on TV were up to 15 percent less likely to correctly answer questions on the virus and related risks, the data showed.

Respondents who cited Facebook as a trusted news source on Covid-19 early in the pandemic were roughly 10-percent less likely to have correct information.

Among respondents, 43 percent cited government websites, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s cdc.gov, as the most trusted source of pandemic-related information, while 27 percent indicated television and 9 percent said health system communications.

“If we agree that the CDC website is a ‘trustable’ source, what our data suggests is that we really need to work hard at getting all people to trust it,” study co-author Dr. Robert P. Lennon said.

“It also suggests that if we want to counter misinformation, we should search across all news sources to find it, so that it can be corrected,” said Lennon, an associate professor of family and community medicine at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center in Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Up to two-thirds of people in the United States rely on social media for news, according to 2017 findings from Pew Research.

A separate analysis conducted by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2018 found that false news stories are 70 percent more likely to be spread on social media than accurate ones.

For this study, Lennon and his colleagues surveyed nearly 6,000 adults in central Pennsylvania between March 25 and 31 last year, when the Covid-19 pandemic was just taking hold in the United States.

Respondents answered questions about where they got their news sources for the coronavirus, and which ones they trusted most.

In addition, they were then given 15 statements about Covid-19 and asked if they thought the statements were true or false, as well as how confident they were in their answers.

The questions were designed to assess knowledge of virus transmission, severity and treatment.

Respondents who said that their most trusted source of information was government health websites were 20 percent to 30 percent more likely to correctly answer Covid-19 questions than other groups.

Those who cited television as either their single most trusted source or as an additional information source were up to 15% less likely to correctly answer the questions, while those who selected “Facebook” were about 10% less likely to do so.

Facebook was used as a proxy for all social media in the study “because we did not have enough users of other social media to analyze” their knowledge, Lennon said.

“We found that people who got any news from Facebook were less likely to have high knowledge, [but] this was before Facebook started aggressively fact-checking related to Covid-19,” Lennon said.

“Our data fully supports rigorous fact checking on social media, but does not condemn any particular platform,” he said.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading