PhilHealth to compensate people to be adversely affected by Covid vaccines

on

The state-run Philippine Health Insurance Corp (PhilHealth) will compensate those who may experience adverse events following immunization (AEFI) for the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) while a measure authorizing the creation and administration of an indemnification fund has yet to be passed, Malacañang said Monday.

This, after a House of Representatives panel approved the proposed Emergency Vaccine Procurement Act of 2021, which authorizes local government units (LGUs) to skip public bidding when buying Covid-19 vaccines.

The proposed measure also provides for the creation and administration of an indemnification fund for the AEFI.

“Well, the proposal pending also in Congress, it is the Philippine government that will compensate,” Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque said in a Palace press briefing.

Roque said Health Secretary Francisco Duque 3rd previously suggested putting PhilHealth in charge of compensation for the AEFIs.

“Our obligation is that we should compensate those who develop side effects and the suggestion of our Secretary of Health is that PhilHealth will compensate those who develop side effects,” he added in Filipino.

He said he believes that the PhilHealth will be able to satisfy the conditions of drugmaker Pfizer and AstraZeneca requiring an indemnification fund for the AEFIs.

“So, when it comes to side effects, of course the PhilHealth will compensate,” he said in Filipino.

Dr. Ernesto Domingo, scientist and professor emeritus at the University of the Philippines College of Medicine, echoed Roque, saying adverse effects to vaccine could also be considered as an illness.

“Yes, it should be PhilHealth that should pay for this because once you react, that’s already an illness strictly speaking. Whether it came from vaccine or somewhere else is immaterial. What you need is support to get you out of the problem that resulted,” he said.

Meanwhile, Roque clarified the assumption that the lack of an indemnification fund was among the reasons for a delay in the arrival of vaccine supplies this month.

“They want the Philippine government just to sign an agreement clarifying who will assume obligation for indemnity. And under the Universal Health Care Law, it is the government through PhilHealth that will assume that,” he said.

Last week, Roque said President Rodrigo Duterte will sign an executive order (EO) allowing LGUs to purchase vaccines against Covid-19 sans going through the process of public bidding.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading