First woman to head WTO is Nigerian

on

The World Trade Organization officially named US-trained Nigerian economist Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala as its seventh director-general on Monday.

Okonjo-Iweala becomes the first African and first woman to lead the WTO. Her arrival comes at a time when the organization looks for solutions to the coronavirus pandemic and trade issues between the United States and China.

“A strong WTO is vital if we are to recover fully and rapidly from the devastation wrought by the Covid-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic,” Okonjo-Iweala said in a statement.

“Our organization faces a great many challenges but working together we can collectively make the WTO stronger, more agile and better adapted to the realities of today,” she added.

The United States under the Trump administration had refused to join other countries in appointing Okonjo-Iweala and instead backed the other finalist for the post, South Korean trade minister Yoo Myung-hee.

After he took office, US President Joe Biden endorsed Okonjo-Iweala and Yoo withdrew her candidacy.

Okonjo-Iweala, who earned a bachelor’s degree in development economics at Harvard and a doctorate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was among the eight candidates nominated for director-general last summer.

Robert Azevedo resigned as WTO chief last August, a year before the end of his second term, saying he felt the organization needed a change in leadership. SOVEREIGNPH

 

Okonjo-Iweala, 66, is chair of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization and sits on the board of Standard Chartered and Twitter. She served two tenures as Nigerian finance minister and spent 25 years as an economist at the World Bank, where she rose to its No. 2 position of managing director of operations.

“Dr. Okonjo-Iweala brings a wealth of knowledge in economics and international diplomacy from her 25 years with the World Bank and two terms as Nigerian finance minister,” the Office of the US Trade Representative said earlier this month.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading