Corruption is destroying our country

on

Every which way you look at issues bedeviling us today, there is that nagging word that often comes to mind, and that is “corruption.” Jong Sung You (2018) defines corruption as “untrustworthy behavior, a betrayal of entrusted power, and a breach of interactional or formal justice (which) negatively affects people’s perceptions of fairness and generalized trust.” Filipinos most often associate corruption with morality or conduct/behavior. Its etymology says it all—corruption breaks or destroy people’s trusts. One must break something in order for the act to be considered a corrupt one.

What exactly does a person breaks for that act to be considered corruption? Usually, those charged with corruption are those entrusted with public office. Lockian belief says that the people has this social contract or covenant with their government. The people entrust their governments with their rights, in exchange for government taking care of them, protecting them from dangers and all.

When a public official robs the people of their monies entrusted with government, it is corruption. When a public official uses his power for his own purpose or uses his office for his family to profit from, it is corruption.

Corruption is basically an illicit act and this is exactly why several people associate this behavior with a break from licit or authorized behavior. It is authorized behavior to do business but it is a corruption if the business leads to impoverishment of the people. It is okey for government to hire private firms and transfer the government’s power to them. It is, however, corruption when the private firm gets enormous benefits from the relationship which is above or in excess with what is allowed by law.

When an individual sells illicit drugs, it is corruption. When one leads another to go astray, it is corruption. When someone induces another to do an act which harms another, it is corruption.

When a private individual builds a road using sub-standard materials, it is corruption. When the road he built causes death or destruction of property of another, it is corruption.

We are losing close to a trillion pesos due to corrupt practices, leading many to presume that corruption has institutionalized itself not just in the bureaucracy but even in the private sector.

Corruption, is, destroying, our country, slowly, but surely. Thru incremental fashion, corruption is eroding the very institutions of trusts which people rely on. When trust disappears, our country loses its ability to unify, and with disunification, comes destruction.

Hence, corruption is something which causes war. As Patriots, we are duty bound to lead the charge and end this cause of war. Otherwise, we may yet witness the erosion of our institutions which has kept us united for more than a century.

 


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading