Hongkong Protesters occupy Victoria Peak on 11th week

on

Hongkongers are now shouting and describing their protests as part of the “Hongkong Revolution”

Hongkong police made a legal headway yesterday when they secured a court order prohibiting protesters from massing up in the country’s international airports. In recent days, there has been delays in international flights to and fro the city as thousands of protesters made the busy international terminal a protest area. Police had just cleared the airports of protesters.

Right now, thousands are massing up in Victoria Peak, in open defiance against Beijing. The Communist Party leadership of China had already warned of severe consequences. In recent past, tolerance is one term which the Beijing leadership had been known to scoff and in its stead, use brutal state forces.

courtesy of Channel 4

What’s different now is that these Hong Kong protests morphed from just a protest against a highly questionable extradition bill to calls for independence, which both the existing leadership in the island and of Beijing find extremely unacceptable. Banners calling for an independent Hongkong will definitely not sit well with the Communist Party whose leaders would consider those as direct threats against China.

The question everyone is asking now– what will China do? Will it send its military forces to deal with these recalcitrant elements in Hongkong? Such scenarios are being floated about weeks before, with authorities hoping to cut the numbers of Hongkongers taking part in street protests.

An attack against the island by People’s Liberation Army liberation forces would send a very strong negative signal against China to the international community. That will drive the expatriate and international business community away from the island and drive the island city into its worse economic recession in decades.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Previous articleCardema’s Cries
Next articleHello, Love, Goodbye
Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading