VP Sara Duterte Defense Uses Technicality to get her off the hook

on

This fourth day of the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte is revelatory. What the defense and their political allies want to achieve in this is this: exculpate Ms. Duterte through a technicality.

This is not only banal but also a grave disservice to the Filipino people who want to know the truth.

And the People will never allow this. This is a travesty of justice.

What we, the people, want to know is whether the Vice President met the very basic or fundamental standards of conduct expected of an impeachable officer.

When the prosecution has already successfully introduced evidence, including the very video showing Ms. Duterte spewing grave threats and invectives against the Chief Executive, his First Lady, and the former Speaker Martin Romualdez, the defense wants to use legal technical maneuvers to destroy the first evidence accepted by the court.

The defense should remember that before being hired as defense counsel, they are, first and foremost, officers of the court. They have the responsibility not to impede the pursuit of the truth.

And the truth is very simple—the truth the people wanted to know is whether the vice president committed the elements of a grave threat and violated her oath, bordering on sedition. Threats against the Chief Executive, the symbol of the Republic, are seditious.

Using procedural attack tactics, such as questioning a witness about the docket number when the witness lacks the competence to answer, is more about optics than substance.

But don’t get me wrong—procedural questions are allowed because cases are judged based on their conformity with substance and process.

On the fourth day of this impeachment trial, the defense lawyer probably forgot that he is not in a regular court of law. The impeachment trial is a special court, open to the public and to the senator-judges.

It would therefore be a grave disservice to the Filipino People if, based on admitted procedural defects, the Vice President were to get off. That’s a very grave case of injustice.

And based on the pace of this trial, this is exactly what the defense team, including their political allies, wants. Despite the strong evidence against Ms. Duterte.

I would say this one time, here: the Filipino people will never allow Ms. Duterte to escape accountability for her conduct on that fateful night in November 2024.

The Filipino People will seek justice somewhere else.

Just as the People are very sensitive about the 1 trillion-peso flood control projects, this issue of threats heaped upon the President by the Vice President is not just immoral—it is a culpable threat, plain and simple. Everyone saw it.

We are a decent race. We will never allow a culpable officer, much less our very own Vice President, to escape accountability on a technicality. If this were to happen, I would not be surprised if people took to the streets.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Richard EM Riverahttp://www.currentph.com
Richard E. M. Rivera is a scholar-practitioner specializing in international relations, governance, and strategic communication. He is completing his degree in International Studies at the University of the Philippines, Diliman, and holds a post-graduate diploma in General Management from the Asian Institute of Management. He currently serves as Managing Partner and Senior Advisor at Rebel Manila Marketing Services, a public relations agency focused on crisis management, reputation strategy, and government relations. Previously, he was Vice President at FleishmanHillard, advising global and regional clients on strategic communication and issues management. A Certified Public Relations Crisis Advisor and Certified Paralegal, Mr. Rivera also co-convenes Artikulo Onse, a broad civic coalition advocating transparency, accountability, and the constitutional principle that public office is a public trust.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading