Washington to impose 104% tariff on China

on

The US will impose a 104% tariff on China beginning Thursday (Manila time), as Washington said that it was a mistake for Beijing to retaliate with 34% duties on American imports.

To recall, US President Donald Trump ordered 34% tariffs on all products from China, to which Beijing responded by imposing the same level of duties on American imports.

“There will be 104% tariffs going into effect on China tonight at midnight,” spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Wednesday.

Trump believes China “has to make a deal” with the US, Leavitt said. “It was a mistake for China to retaliate.”

If China reaches out to make a deal, she said Trump will be “incredibly gracious.”

“But he’s going to do what’s best for the American people. … The Chinese want to make a deal. They just don’t know how to do it,” she said.

Nearly 70 countries have already reached out to the US for negotiations on tariffs.

Trump announced the imposition of a 10% minimum tariff on all imports and higher reciprocal tariffs on the US’ biggest trading partners, including China and the European Union.

The US president also directed his country’s trade team to start making deals with each individual country.

“He directed them to have tailor-made trade deals with each and every country that calls up this administration to strike a deal,” she added.

“As the president said, the reciprocal tariffs, which will continue to go in effect as these deals are negotiated and ongoing, will generate trillions of dollars in revenue to the United States,” she said.

ANADOLU PHOTO


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading