Biden-Trump fight in U.S. elections: update

on

A recent CNN poll revealed that Vice President Kamala Harris’s approval ratings are close to those of former U.S. president Donald Trump in a hypothetical electoral matchup. According to the poll, Harris received 45% support, while Trump garnered 47%. In another survey that pitted former First Lady Michelle Obama against Trump, the results showed that 50% of voters favored Obama, whereas 39% supported Trump. This raises the question of whom the Democrats might choose.

The question is premature. Right now, President Joe Biden wants to continue his second bout with Trump even though he got several brickbats for his lackadaisical performance during the CNN presidential debate. Many senior analysts already predicted a landslide from Trump if the Democrats still field Biden. There’s still time for change, yet Biden believes he can still trounce Trump, which Harris also believes.

And yet, of course, many feel that perception-wise, Biden’s stoic and sickly composition during the debate alone would cost him the presidency. Young voters would love to see a sexy and physically fit president. Imagine Biden meeting Putin face to face – that image alone would shame every American.

We still don’t know why Democrats are not standing up against Biden. Someone should tell the 79-year-old that his time is up and hand the torch to someone younger. Here’s a question: If Harris were a man and a pure-blooded WASP, would Democrats still support Biden?

Michelle Obama presents a unique challenge for some politicians. It’s not just because she’s Black but also because she’s a woman. Some people who belong to the dominant ethnicity feel uncomfortable with the idea of another Obama in power, especially one who is not only Black but also a woman.

Will freedom-loving Americans aligned with the Democratic party sacrifice the presidency to another disastrous Trump era just because the better alternatives are females and people of mixed race? Maybe so.

This frightening scenario brings chills on NATO members since Trump is not anymore an enigma. Trump has already said what he intends to do if he recovers the presidency. Everyone already knows that he’s chummy with Russia and possibly even bedmates with rightist political leaders in Europe. With a second Trump presidency and a rightwing dominated European parliament, what happens now to liberal democratic forces?

 


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Ricky Riverahttp://newphilrevolution.blogspot.com
Ricky Rivera is a longtime journalist and political observer. He graduated from the University of the Philippines in Diliman and studied law first at San Beda and then at Ateneo. He is a certified Paralegal by the UP College of Law and studying international relations at the same university and general management at Asian Institute of Management.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading