Duterte wagging another Mindanao war?

on

A year from now and we will again troop to the polls to elect our leaders. This up-coming elections is a watershed in our history because it signals either the end or a continuation of the Duterte administration. Obviously, there is a push and pull already happening between and among political personalities in this country. Recently, polls identified the slow yet steady descent of President Rodrigo Duterte’s ratings especially in the National Capital Region and outlying provinces. Though political observers would just shrug their shoulders and say that this Southward trajectory is expected for an exiting administration, the fact is, it is happening during a pandemic, which handling is the core issue now being hotly debated online and offline. Duterte’s group is not entirely assured of an electoral victory. The administration is in serious trouble and is desirous to create a much bigger meat for the ravenous public to devour.

Tyrants in history had always found an entertaining solution during times of pandemic, poverty and hunger. During Roman times, the likes of Nero entertained the crowd by throwing Christians as meat for lions. In Hitler’s time, wars occupied the busy lives of Germans much the same way as modern tyrants do in our age.

President Rodrigo Roa Duterte is your expert magician—he always has a new rabbit that he can pull straight out of his old bag of political tricks. Never mind if that rabbit would cause a people great damage, for Duterte, a seasoned politician, the important thing right now is survival. He needs to survive the next twelve months unscathed, just like his political ally, former president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo whose nine-year administration was wracked with political attacks left and right. Arroyo survived because of her expert handling of the interests of Big Business and traditional political powers and partly credit the communication experts behind her whose advices worked wonders after that Hello Garci debacle.

Right now, Duterte’s reputation is being pulled to shreds by millions of angry netizens, up in arms over the evident bungling of the much needed vaccination programs and Duterte’s unpatriotic stance on the West Philippine sea. The opposition wants these issues to define the 2022 presidential elections. Obviously, the administration wants nothing more than erase these issues from the minds of voters. Traditional political beliefs tell us that the administration must come up with another bigger issue that people would talk about. At this stage, former president Joseph Estrada comes to mind—in efforts to at least recover from the devastating blows of the opposition against his administration—he conjured that long war in Mindanao that he expected to serve as foil over several reputation damaging attacks upon him. Instead of benefiting him, the war actually hastened his fall from power. A year later, Estrada found himself at the patio of the San Juan municipal hall where he began his political career during the Martial law days.

There are talks that Duterte is mulling the same thing. The fact is the script is already ready. Remember that Marawi siege incident? Several days or about weeks I think after Duterte went to Mindanao and gave a speech before Mindanao leaders, this incident happened. Why Marawi? Well, Marawi happens to be the biggest Muslim city in the country and the booty there is, you guessed right, the hectares that once was a military reservation. Why, you ask the Marawi rehab is still not yet finished? Well, sources told this writer that some military officials do not want to give up on that military reservation and the AFP intends to build its own installation there. This plan is nothing short of treachery to the Maranaos.

Ground reports in Maguindanao indicate that the local terror groups there are preparing for another engagement with the military. Be forewarned though—another war might really turn Mindanao into a flashpoint of Jihadist war— something that might affect regional security.

This government must not toy with this war idea—if this war is to be used to deflect attention from the bungling of the COVID-19 response, then, find another one. A war would surely eat much of the state’s resources. A war would further weaken our economy and put us back to the stone age. Worse, this war could turn things around for the Jihadists and could easily attract foreign fighting elements.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading