IMF sees US-led recovery of global economy

on

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is projecting improvements to global economy after President Joe Biden signed his $1.9-trillion stimulus package into law, with expectations it will boost a vaccine-led recovery worldwide.

Kristalina Georgieva, the IMF’s managing director made the comments in a speech Tuesday as the IMF prepares to release its latest World Economic Outlook.

“In January we projected global growth at 5.5 percent in 2021,” Georgieva said. “We now expect a further acceleration: partly because of additional policy support – including the new fiscal package in the United States – and partly because of the expected vaccine-powered recovery in many advanced economies later this year.”

She said the continued recovery has been a combination of the medical community saving lives, essential workers providing support to keep the economy moving and the scientists rapidly coming up with a vaccine. Georgieva said countries took considerable financial risk pumping trillions into the economy.

“Without these synchronized measures, the global contraction last year would have been at least three times worse,” Georgieva said. “Just think about it – this could have been another Great Depression. Also, we did not have another global financial crisis – not just because of the extraordinary measures, but also because countries had worked together over the past decade to make banking systems more resilient.”

She said her comments were not to suggest there are still countries and regions struggling because of the pandemic. She said the challenges and unknowns about the coronavirus and its variants still leave a level of high uncertainty.

For emerging and developing countries, excluding China, the [economic] loss will be much worse – at 20 percent, cutting one-fifth of what is already a much smaller per capita income than in richer countries,” Georgieva said. “This loss of income means millions of people will face destitution, homelessness, and hunger.”

She urged the world powers to deal with human capital and other long-term “scars” from the pandemic at a more accelerated level and risk allowing the challenges to linger.

 


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading