Fishery agency warns shellfish from areas with ‘red tide

on

The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) on Thursday warned that shellfish collected at coastal waters in various parts of the country still tested positive for a paralytic or “red tide” poison that is beyond the regulatory limit.

The shellfish in the coastal waters of the Inner Malampaya Sound in Taytay, Palawan; Sorsogon Bay in Sorsogon; Dauis and Tagbilaran City in Bohol; Tambobo Bay in Siaton, Negros Oriental; Calubian town and Cancato Bay in Tacloban City in Leyte; Dumanquillas Bay in Zamboanga del Sur; and Murcielagos Bay (Sapang Dalaga and Baliangao) and Ozamiz City in Misamis Occidental were among those that tested positive for the red tide toxin.

The BFAR and concerned local government units (LGUs) also raised the alarm on the consumption of shellfish found to contain red tide toxin that is beyond the regulatory limit in Taguines Lagoon in Mahinog, Camiguin; Balite Bay in Mati City, Davao Oriental; and Lianga Bay and the coastal waters of Hinatuan in Surigao del Sur.

“All types of shellfish and Acetes sp. or “alamang” gathered from these areas are not safe for human consumption,” the bureau published in its bulletin.

However, it stated that fish, squid, shrimps, and crabs are safe for human consumption, provided they are fresh and washed thoroughly, and internal organs, such as gills and intestines, are removed before cooking.

Red tide is a term used to describe a phenomenon where the water is discolored by high algal biomass or the concentration of algae.

This syndrome can be life-threatening and often shows itself within two hours of consumption.

In non-lethal cases, these conditions may appear in a few days. In severe instances, individuals may experience respiratory arrest within 24 hours of consumption.

Meanwhile, the BFAR, in partnership with the US Agency for International Development (USAID), noted that government assets and the public would share the responsibility in reducing illegal, undocumented, unreported (IUU) fishing.

The bureau also said it is developing a threat assessment tool and fishing index to systemize its monitoring activities.

“Our strong resolve to prevent and put an end to IUU fishing in Philippine waters will not waiver, especially now that we are gaining momentum technology-wise,” BFAR Director Eduardo Gongona said in a statement.

He said with the use of science and data, they are in the process of developing an IUU Fishing Index and Threat Assessment Tool, which will be adopted in the 12 fisheries management areas.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading