Biden signs $1.9-trillion Covid relief package to help stimulate US economy

on

US President Joe Biden signed a $1.9-trillion Covid-19 relief bill on Thursday, the one-year anniversary of the declaration of the pandemic and first shutdowns to contain it.

“This historic legislation is about rebuilding the backbone of this country, and giving people in this nation, working people, middle-class folks, a people who built the country a fighting chance,” Biden said in brief remarks before signing the bill a day ahead of schedule.

The American Rescue Plan, one of the largest relief efforts ever passed by the government, includes billions for a third stimulus payment for Americans and money for more vaccinations, vital benefits like unemployment and an increased child tax credit. The measure also helps state and local governments recover.

 

The Internal Revenue Service is expected to immediately begin sending out $1,400 stimulus payments.

It was on March 11, 2020, that the World Health Organization (WHO) upgraded Covid-19 from an epidemic to a pandemic.

With Biden signing the $.19-trillion stimulus package, all three major US stock indexes hit record highs also on Thursday as a rally in tech stocks continued/

The Nasdaq led the way, gaining 2.52 percent, while the S&P 500 climbed 1.04 percent and the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed the day up 188.57 points, or 0.58 percent, extending gains from Wednesday.

“The stimulus is beating the virus at least as far as the market is concerned,” Scott Ladner, chief investment officer at Horizon Investments, said. “And real rates being near negative is just historically a very strong tailwind for asset prices.”

Markets also reacted to positive unemployment data as the Labor Department on Thursday reported that 712,000 US workers filed for new unemployment benefits as analysts were expecting about 725,000 initial claims for the week ending March 6.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading