Locsin is wrong: RP should protest Myanmar coup d’etat

on

Foreign Affairs secretary Teddyboy Locsin should re-read his history. Locsin blames the West for Aung San Suu Kyi’s present predicament. He claims that the West “broke” Suu Kyi when the former president sided with the Myanmar military on the Rohinya issue. You must remember that San Suu Kyi did nothing to address the inhuman treatment the Rohinyans got from the military. Locsin says the West tore her up.

Okey, Mr. Locsin. If the West did tear her up, does it justify the military’s action of undermining the results of a democratic elections won by no less than the party of Suu Kyi?  Does it justify even the arrests of the Nobel peace prize winner and her supporters?

Mr. Locsin should be reminded that the West did not tear Suu Kyi to pieces– the British and the Americans criticized the Burmese military. The world understood that San Suu Kyi’s position was a balancing act. Instead of a learned statement, Locsin’s rhetoric sounds like that of the PR person of the Burmese military which he described as the one institution that glues Myanmar together as a nation.

Myanmar unity does not lie with the military— a nation becomes and stays as one because of the people’s vision of themselves and their interactions with their environment. For ten years, the People had enjoyed their freedoms and no amount of draconian measures can reverse the gains the people already got.

The West is not to be blamed–it is the military elites who lost in the last elections dominated by Suu Kyi’s political party. The Philippines should condemn this coup d’etat and side with what is Right.

Locsin’s position is similar with China’s. Locsin knows that China has strategic interests in Myanmar because this country blocks China’s access to the Indian Ocean. For decades, China had closely developed ties with the Burmese military. And this coup is surely backed by China. Yesterday, China blocked efforts at the United Nations to issue an international condemnation of the coup d’etat.

Meanwhile, the new Biden administration had condemned the coup. As an immediate response, the United States decided to suspend military aid to Myanmar.

The state of emergency that the military declared several days ago, is expected to last for a year. The military elites promised to conduct another “free and democratic elections” within a year.

Aside from the United States, Australia and other countries condemned the coup d’etat. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of Burmese people are actively opposing the coup. Some have gone out of their houses to protest. San Suu Kyi called for acts of civil disobedience against the military establishment.

 


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading