Netizens fry QC Task Force Head for “shoot to kill” statement on MECQ

on

Thousands of Filipino netizens today put Quezon City Task Force Disiplina head Rannie Ludovica to task for allegedly ordering his men to “shoot on sight” people who violate the Modified Enhanced Community Quarantine. Ludovica also wished to kill people whom he saw having cockfights in Barangay Holy Spirit in Quezon City.

Susme, you already saw what those people are doing that was illegal, then, why did you not arrest them for violating city ordinances prohibiting sabong?

Ludovica’s statement counters the city ordinance issued by the City mayor and her council on possible repercussions for people who will violate the government’s MECQ announcement. There is no law that allows warrantless arrests or shoot to kill against persons who violates the MECQ government regulations.

In his recent presidential address, President Rodrigo Roa Duterte placed the entire National Capital Region (NCR) including the provinces of Bulacan, Rizal and Laguna under modified enhanced community quarantine that mandates the limitation of human movement. Only those working in essential services are allowed to leave their homes.

Duterte’s decision came shortly after two groups of Filipino health workers appealed for a change in government policies insofar as quarantines are concerned. Health workers say the health system is nearing collapse and government should immediately provide concrete steps to be taken to avert a disaster.

Instead of changing his policies, Duterte again resorted to strict quarantine procedures involving state security agencies, a move that has been criticized by many local and international groups for its ineffectiveness.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading