Nothing personal vs. Duterte family for pushing anti-dynasty law

on


Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon on Tuesday had expressed that  there is nothing personal when he dared President Rodrigo Duterte to use his political clout to encourage Congress to pass an anti-dynasty law.

“Ang pagkakaakala niya, tinutukoy ko ang kaniyang pamilya,” Drilon said in an interview on Dobol B sa News TV.

“Yan ay isang prinsipyo at ako ay naniniwala na may sapat na standard ang pangulo na kaniyang itutulak itong anti-dynasty law considering his political clout,” he said.

Duterte lambasted Drilon during his fifth State of the Nation Address (SONA) on Monday, at one time calling him “hypocrite” and accusing him of being on the side of the Lopez family, owners of ABS-CBN Corporation.

To recall, after Duterte’s controversial Jolo speech earlier this month about dismantling oligarchy made the news, Drilon dared the president to pass an anti-dynasty law — a challenge that apparently did not sit well with Duterte who has three children occupying elected positions.

Duterte’s eldest son Paolo represents the first district of Davao City in the House of Representatives, while his daughter, Sara Duterte-Carpio, is Davao City mayor and his youngest son, Sebastian, is the vice mayor.

Meanwhile, Drilon maintained that he was not defending the Lopezes but press freedom when he criticized the House committee’s decision to junk ABS-CBN’s franchise application.

“Wala akong utang ng loob sa mga Lopezes, sila po ay kaibigan ko dahil kababayan ko sila pero wala kaming relasyon,” he said.

Drilon said like Duterte, he had political ads that the network failed to air in 2016.

He also denied having a hand as part of ACCRA law firm in the drafting of a concession contract with Ayala Water — an accusation that Duterte also mentioned in his SONA.

“On the grave of my parents, sinusumpa ko na ni isang period, hindi ako kasama diyan sa concession agreement. Yan ay nabuo noong panahon ni Pangulong [Fidel] Ramos at ako ay nasa Senado na noon,” he said./Stacy Ang


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading