Rice Tariffication Law, a death sentence to three million Filipino farmers

on

0874E3ED-DB8A-46A7-80B7-C1A71E0448C4
Filipino farmers  and stakeholders in the rice industry issued a joint statement on Wednesday calling for the repeal of the rice tariffication law, stressing  that such a law would be a virtual death to three million rice farmers in the country.

“We, the farmers and major stakeholders in the rice industry, are again joining hands in a presscon-symbolic action to protest against the furthering and deepening negative impacts of the rice liberalization law, or better known as the Rice Tariffication Law (R.A. 11203) to various sectors,” the statement said.

“The RTL meted out a virtual death sentence on the country’s three million small rice farmers whose rice farming tradition is older than the Republic itself,” the statement read.

A total of 41 signatories signed the statement. Among them  were:  Federation of Free Farmers (FFF), Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP), Pambansang Kilusan ng mga Samahang Magsasaka (PAKISAMA) , Kilusan para sa Repormang Agraryo at Katarungang Panlipunan (KATARUNGAN), Pambansang Koalisyon ng Kababaihan sa Kanayunan (PKKK),  National Movement for Food Sovereignty (NMFS),  Freedom from Debt Coaliton (FDC), Bantay Bigas.

“We demand that the government immediately impose general safeguard measures on rice imports, impose penalties on rice importers who have clearly undervalued their imports, and find legal ways to deter overimportation in the future,” the group stressed.

The farmers and rice industry stakeholders are unanimous in their analysis that the Rice Liberalization Law is a defective policy that has been crafted without careful thought.

“We therefore demand the immediate suspension of the RLL’s implementation and the conduct of a comprehensive review of its effects on the rice industry, farmers, farm workers and government employees of the NFA. Afterwhich and if necessary, decisely repeal the law to pave the way for a better piece of legislation that will protect and preserve our local rice industry and circumvent the threat to total rice import dependence. In the end, our goal should be food security and self-sufficiency,” the group also said.

The group said that one year had passed since the passage of the said law.

“However, we are a witness to the continuing ineptness and incompetence of government to address the sorry plight of both farmers and farm workers. Their pleas and appeals have fallen on deaf ears despite of numerous attempts of farmers to diplomatically talk sense to government and call for changes in the law – whether to amend, suspend or better yet repeal RLL/RTL,” they said.

They said that upon  checking with the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) data, palay prices continue to plunge despite the reportedly massive funds expended by the government to prop up palay prices, they said.

The third week of January 2020 showed farmgate prices at P15.89 compared to P19.81 on the same week and month last year. If the PSA data were, at all, reflective of the true pricing realities at the paddy level.

Palay below the 14 percent  moisture content sold at a depressing price range of P10 to P12/kilo, just below the production cost and the PSA people have utterly failed to capture these data.

Latest  market prices of rice showed that retail rice prices have not dropped to the projected and desired consumer surplus levels and have merely returned to their levels in 2017 after spiking in 2018.

This is despite the fact that shortly after the passage of RTL/RLL, three million tons of recorded imported rice entered the country last year. This was more than double the import requirements of the country and made the Philippines the world’s top rice importer in 2019.

“From the passage of the law until today, the situation clearly shows government’s unreadiness to address farmers’ woes and expected losses. Up to now, government has not delivered on the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF) in its totality. We are entering the second year but the first year has yet to show significant impact. Its snail paced implementation has only further put at risk the livelihoods of the sector,” they said.

Every peso that is taken out of the income of farmers counts, because this means a reduction in their purchasing power to avail of basic needs for their families, including education and healthcare, they said.

The rice liberalization reform imposed by the government adds too heavy a burden on an already vulnerable sector, who are mostly buried in debt due to their high production costs. It forces them, specifically women farmers, to take on more work in addition to their duties in the fields and their homes. This is despite them being the producers of food for the Filipino population, they said./Stacy Ang


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading