Filipino rice farmers lost P75 billion last year due to depressed farm gate prices – militant groups

on

F0C9CE07-5643-4AE9-8EBC-FD3AAFD6FE23


The Bantay Bigas rice watch group, Amihan National Federation of Peasant Women and Anakpawis Party-list revealed  on Wednesday that Filipino rice farmers lost at least P74.8 billion due to depressed farm gates which the groups blamed on the implementation of the Republic Act 11203 or Rice Liberalization Law.

“It has been a trend, since the country joined the World Trade Organization in 1995, when there was even the slightest buzz of arrival of imported rice, farm gate prices at the barrios are forced down by traders, throwing farmers into bankruptcy and indebtedness. It is worse now, because it was institutionalized by RA 11203. This is the anti-peasant legacy of the Duterte regime,” Rafael Mariano, former Anakpawis Party-list lawmaker, said in a press statement.

Anakpawis staunchly opposed the law when it was still being deliberated at the lower house and as alternative primarily pushed for the Rice Industry Development Act (RIDA) bill during the 17th congress.

The bill, now House Bill 477 being pushed by Gabriela Women’s Party Rep. Arlene Brosas, proposes the authentic development program for the national rice industry, involving the three-year allocation of P495 billion, which includes P185 billion for its core programs and P310 billion for the procurement program of the NFA.

Moreover, Bantay Bigas blamed the law for the rice farmers’ losses, as exposed by government data. These are: 

  • 2018 value of production of palay at P385 billion for the volume of production of a little more than 19 million metric tons, or P20.19 per kilogram average value or farm gate price;
  • 2019 value of production of palay at P305 billion for the volume of production of a little more than 18.8 million metric tons, or P16.22 per kilogram or decline of about P4;
  • 2019 volume of production of palay if previous value per kg was maintained, value would have been P380 billion, thus, potential losses due to depressed farm gate prices would be at P74.8 billion.

 

“We have been warning against this even before the enactment of the law, but Duterte chose to favor the rich oligarchs who dominate rice importation and trade. He is ruling against the interest of poor Filipino rice farmers. Thus, we call on all stakeholders to join the call of repealing the law,” Cathy Estavillo, spokesperson of Bantay Bigas and Secretary-General of Amihan,  said.

Bantay Bigas led the 50,000-signature petition to repeal RA 11203 and it is aiming another batch of 100,000 signatures by March. Estavillo said that the public warmly welcomed the petition drive as opposition to the law and liberalization policies for the rice sector.

The groups said that undermining the rice food security, self-sufficiency and self-reliance, and abandoning the “food on the table” agenda would be an undisputable legacy of the Duterte regime, and the Filipino peasants have engraved this on their consciousness and would never be erased.

“We urge the Filipino people to rise up against rice liberalization, junk the law and uphold the national rice industry, as legacy of the people’s struggle to the next generation Filipinos,” the groups said.

Bantay Bigas and Amihan urged the people to join the” Rise for Rice! Junk Rice Liberalization!” protest this coming February 14 at Mendiola bridge, Manila, marking the laws’ first year implementation./Stacy Ang


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading