Pentagon hopes PH stick with US weapons amid Russia’s offer

on

MANILA, Philippines — Following Russia’s offer to improve the security capability of the Philippines, the Pentagon has on Wednesday, 06 November 2019, encouraged the Philippines, a defense ally, to keep on using military equipment from the United States.

It may be recalled Presidential Spokesman Salvador Panelo recently said there is an “ongoing negotiation” between PH and Moscow about the “purchase of certain military equipment.”

However, US defense department spokesperson David Eastburn said, the US is “not gonna obviously dictate to any sovereign nation,” but it will be “a lot easier” to fight alongside its allies if they are using the same equipment.

“We’re not gonna obviously dictate to a sovereign nation, their ability to work with or the purchase of equipment from foreign countries. What I would say is obviously we have a deep history with the Philippines and we do a lot of interoperability, training, a lot of engagements, exercises with our Philippine counterparts and it’s easier to do it when we use the same equipment,” Eastburn told Filipino journalists.

In helping Manila increase its defense capabilities, Moscow “will never use our defense cooperation as a pretext to interfere into domestic affairs,” Russian Ambassador to the Philippines Igor Khovaev said last month.

The US may penalize allies who purchase weapons and military equipment from Russia, said Philippine Ambassador to Washington Jose Manuel “Babe” Romualdez.

The Pentagon should “come out with a good offer because we really need heavy-lift helicopters especially for disasters,” Romualdez said.

The largest nuclear power in the world, Moscow and Washington, have discussed various issues, including tensions in Syria and Ukraine’s annexation of Crimea, and allegations of electoral intervention.

Meanwhile, Russia’s ally China is engaged in a trade war with the US and a land dispute over the South China Sea with the Philippines.

While President Rodrigo Duterte “keeps his alliance with the US, he feels that with all those countries willing to help, (the) the Philippines needs to open up,” Panelo said. (Marian Andrei Sinamban/IAMIGO/CNS)


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Marian Andrei Nicolas
Marian Nicolas is a member of the Current News Service (CNS). As Content Producer, Nicolas writes interesting lifestyle and fashion pieces including reviews for Currentph.com. You can reach her at Marian.nicolas@currentph.com.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading