A Journalist, A Blogger

on

By LUCHIE ACLAN ARGUELLES

EditorLuchie5

As  early as 2009, there already existed unidentified bloggers and anonymous trolls who thereby posted abusive language and threats. The term “trolls” were already used as these bloggers were believed to be puppets or mouthpiece of certain groups.
Whether writing online or offline, one must self-regulate and take responsibility.

WRITERS seem to be confused with the hat they wear.

At one time, the Palace started the unconventional, giving Press accreditations to bloggers. Duh!? There were vehement objections from true-blue journalists who worked hard to get to the prime beat and did not just emerge from nowhere.

In case there is difficulty in recognizing terms, let me put my thoughts in the simplest terms.

In a regular newsroom, a would-be journalist goes through a needle’s eye to get a beat or coverage assignment. A cub reporter usually starts with police beat and evolves into a strike-everywhere, except for specialized and major assignments like Malacañang, Senate, House, the Supreme Court, and Business/Banking.

Where before the likes of Customs, Immigration and Airport, Environment, Agriculture, and other “Bopis” beats were minor assignments, most of these are now next to prime. Bopis refers to government offices around the Quezon Memorial Circle and East Avenue hospitals – Lung, Heart, Kidney.

 

The Newsroom

Editors are the generals of the newsroom. Along the hierarchy are deskmen and section editors who are the whip lashers, whose ink-dirtied fingers make the printed version come out.

The fad now is online or interactive publishing. The system remains the same except that the output is not printed on paper. Broadcast version of online publishing are what are referred to as their TV news channel. Online is more visual – photos and videos – than text.

Going back to the ranking, budding reporters don’t become deskmen until they are seasoned and had made a round of the minor and primary assignments. This is the convention. Of course, in times of need, the chief editor has the prerogative to reassign.

Correspondents are contributors covering less important beats and the provinces. They are recognized by the publication or stations and may accept assignments or submit enterprise stories. In due deference to reporters in charge of the particular beat, the latter gets priority placement or credit.

Columnists, on one hand, are specific to the theme appointed to them by the editor, say, political, educational, religious, and science and technology, etc. There is no hard and fast rule for veteran columnists, though.

All of the above are categorized as journalists with specific space, time-bound and constrained by the editorial policies, and by the strictures embodied in the Journalists’ Code of Ethics.

And, ah, yes. They are collectively called the Media. The Medium. The ones in between the source and readers or listeners as purveyors of truth. Yes, THE Truth, balanced and fair.

Where Do Bloggers Fit In?

With the inception of the information highway in the early 80s, an infinite space opened up for digital communications that eventually gave birth to the Internet. This time was when the term “social media” evolved in this alternative platform.

Bloggers of all shapes, sizes, color, creed, and persuasion occupied their own space in the Net, in their own time. No deadlines. No rules.

What I can say is that bloggers cannot claim to be journalists but journalists can be bloggers. Unless the former go through the newsroom hierarchy and reporting rigors, bloggers stay as writers in their own space.

If journalists have their own ethical standards to abide by, bloggers do, too.  There is no such thing as absolute freedom, Bloggy. Cyberlibel could be cruel, too, though, sometimes, not fair.

Of Ethics And Trolls

The Journalists’ Code of Ethics is like what Ten Commandments is to Christians. In the 1920s, Walter Williams (1864-1935) penned this creed in the hope of professionalizing journalism. Williams founded the world’s first school of journalism at the University of Missouri.

In 2007, Tim O’Reilly of the O’Reilly Media, Inc. came up with the idea to craft a Bloggers’ Code of Conduct to “enforce civility on their blogs by being civil themselves and moderating comments”.

As  early as 2009, there already existed unidentified bloggers and anonymous trolls who thereby posted abusive language and threats. The term “trolls” were already used as these bloggers were believed to be puppets or mouthpiece of certain groups.

Whether writing online or offline, one must self-regulate and take responsibility.

The National Press Club disseminates the code to advance professional standards while promoting free expression and mutual respect.

So there.(Luchie Arguelles)


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Marian Andrei Nicolas
Marian Nicolas is a member of the Current News Service (CNS). As Content Producer, Nicolas writes interesting lifestyle and fashion pieces including reviews for Currentph.com. You can reach her at Marian.nicolas@currentph.com.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading