” They did not help us in Normandy”– Trump’s reason why he is not in favour of helping Syrians against Turks

on

United States president Donald Trump’s reason why he withdrew U.S. troops from Syria which left the hapless country exposed from Turkish attacks is that Syrians allegedly did not help Allied forces during the Normandy landing in World War two. The pullout of US troops is being blamed for the attacks being conducted by Turkey right now in that North African nation.

Syrian communities are now being attacked by Turkish forces under the guise of “eliminating extremists forces” reportedly hiding in that formerly ISIS occupied territory. The US, however, justified their pullout after the fall of ISIS in towns and cities of Syria.

Many analysts, including Agustus King, American Senator from Maine, believes that the pullout gave the Turks the opportunity to invade the weakening Syria. Turkey, according to King, has informed Trump a year before of its intention to invade their neighbour, Syria.

King, however, believes that Trump is using the Syrian attacks as a pretext or as a diversion to public attention on growing calls for his impeachment. Speaker Pelosi has called on an impeachment inquiry over a whistleblower’s testimony on alleged calls by Trump to the Ukrainian president to help provide information on activities of a son-in-law of former Vice President Joe Biden. Biden has since denied committing any wrongdoing.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading