US govt shutdown looms as Republican senator block spending bill

on

Senate Republicans have blocked a spending bill as a government shutdown and a debt default looms, saying they would refuse to vote for any policy that raises the debt ceiling, a routine procedure that authorizes the U.S. Treasury to finance existing obligations.

The bill to extend government funding and cover emergency assistance failed to pass the Senate on Monday evening after it narrowly passed the House along party lines earlier in the month.

The Democrats needed 60 votes to move the measure along but failed to attract a single Republican to cross the aisle during the Monday vote, which downed the measure with a tally of 48 in favor to 50 against with two not voting.

Democrats sought to pass the bill to stave off a government shutdown on Thursday when government coffers go dry and to raise the debt ceiling before mid-October in order to avoid defaulting for the first time in history.

Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat-New York, lashed out at his GOP colleagues for putting the United States in this position.

“I want to make sure everyone understands exactly what has happened on the Senate floor: The Republican Party has now become the party of default, the party that says America doesn’t pay its debts,” Schumer said from the floor following the vote. “Our country is staring down the barrel of two totally Republican-manufactured disasters – a government shutdown and a first-ever default on the national debt, the impacts of both would gravely harm every single American in this country.”

The result of the vote, which Schumer had earlier called, was expected as not one Republican had voiced support for the bill despite the GOP having lifted the debt ceiling multiple times during the presidency of Donald Trump.

Schumer said the Democrats will be taking further action this week to prevent the shutdown without specifying the plans.

“What the Republicans in the senate did tonight is not normal,” he said. “This isn’t your typical Washington fracas and it shouldn’t be treated as such. It has far more severe consequences than the typical political catfight.” CURRENTPH NEWS SERVICE

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

El Niño, Ayuda and the Politics of Disaster: Are...

The Marcos administration is preparing billions of pesos in drought-related spending. But will that money build permanent water security, or deepen a political culture in which disaster relief becomes a source of electoral patronage?

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading