South Korean lawmaker warns China on interfering in future polls

on

An opposition South Korean lawmaker issued a warning against “election interference” after the Chinese ambassador to Seoul criticized local presidential candidate Yoon Seok-youl.

Park Jin, 64, said Friday in a Facebook post that Ambassador Xing Haiming had “shown disrespect for diplomatic customs” after making “very regrettable” remarks about Yoon, Dong-A Ilbo reported.

Park said Xing’s remarks challenging a “prominent presidential candidate on foreign policy and national security” are a “clear violation of sovereignty.”

Park’s statement comes after Xing wrote an opinion piece published to South Korea’s JoongAng Ilbo on Friday.

Xing said in his article that the U.S.-South Korea alliance “must not harm China’s interests” and that the alliance should not dictate China-South Korea ties.

Xing’s piece was a response to a JoongAng interview with Yoon published Thursday. The South Korean presidential candidate had said that the U.S.-Korea alliance is the “solid foundation” on which to “strengthen cooperative relations with countries that share our values.”

South Korea can only conduct diplomacy with China within this framework, Yoon had said, while defending Seoul’s decision to deploy the U.S. missile defense system THAAD in 2016, a move that upset Beijing.

 

“If [China] wants to insist on THAAD withdrawal, it must first withdraw its long-range radar deployed near its borders,” Yoon had said.

Xing claimed in his article that South Korea’s decision to deploy THAAD “seriously undermined China’s security interests” and the people of China have felt “less safe” since the decision.

Choi Kang, vice president of the Asan Institute for Policy Studies, said that Xing’s article “could be misinterpreted as being disrespectful while regarding Korea as an easy opponent,” the Chosun Ilbo reported Friday.

It also is not common for an ambassador to comment on a host country’s domestic candidates. China’s central government could have “pressured” Xing to write the piece, Choi said.

China imposed informal sanctions against Korea after Seoul decided to move forward with THAAD deployment. Seoul has avoided confronting Beijing on its human rights record and ongoing crackdowns in Hong Kong and Xinjiang.


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading