Duque not reprimanded by Duterte for erroneous remark on flattening curve of COVID

on

2501823E-5AC3-4371-95F7-470E1C862FDE
President Rodrigo Duterte did not scold Health Secretary Francisco Duque III over the secretary’s erroneous remarks that the Philippines has “successfully flattened” the coronavirus pandemic curve, Malacañang said on Thursday.

Duque on Wednesday initially said the country flattened the pandemic curve in April, only to retract his statement hours later to say that what he meant was a “bent” in the curve.

After causing public confusion, Duque  was seen in a meeting with Duterte  on Wednesday night.

“Wala pong pagsabon na nangyari (There was no scolding that happened.),” Presidential Spokesman Harry Roque said in a Palace press briefing.

Roque said Duque immediately informed him of the erroneous remarks which were also corrected.

“Matapos nangyari yan, tumawag agad sa akin si Sec. Duque at sinabi nga niya na parang mali yung salitang nagamit niya, sabi ko korekin lang natin (After the incident, Sec. Duque immediately called me and informed me that he used the wrong word. I told him that let’s just correct it.),” Roque said.

“Kinorek lang po. Di naman na-flatten, nabali at ang ibig sabihin niya eh mukha talagang kumonti ang kaso matappos tayo mag ECQ (enhanced community quarantine). (It was just corrected. It wasn’t flattened but bent. And what he meant was that there were fewer cases after the ECQ.),” said Roque.

This was not the first time that Duque drew flak for his remarks in relation to the pandemic.

In May, Duque announced that the Philippines was already seeing a second wave of infections only for the Palace to clarify that Duque only had a “different opinion.”

Several individual an dgroups, including doctors and nurses associations, majority of the Senate, as well as some politicians have demanded the resignation of Duque for his alleged mishandling of the COVID response in the Philippines./Stacy Ang

 

 


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years ago (DOTr, 1999). At rush hour, many...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading