Fisherfolk, advocates call for climate justice at UP ‘protest fair’

on

 

EB570A2B-12F7-444F-88B8-49A0A680F3EA
As the University of the Philippines – Diliman campus held  its annual fair dubbed this year as “Tumindig sa Himig,” the fisherfolk group Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya (Pamalakaya) and Climate Change Network for Community-based Initiatives (CCNCI) on Friday  called for climate justice, the very theme of the day’s “Roots Music Festival.”

The groups at their booth also held  a petition signing against Manila Bay reclamation projects, also for the repeal of the Republic Act 11203 Rice Liberalization Law.

“This is a positive act, for the youth-students to expose themselves on fundamental issues. We have garnered many signatures opposing reclamation projects in Manila Bay. We commend the organizers such as the university student council and other organizations,” said Salvador France, Pamalakaya Secretary-General.

The group said that students who signed the petition appreciated the campaign of poor fisherfolk of Bacoor City who were manning the booth against the 420-hectare Bacoor Reclamation Project .

There were  also students who expressed  interest  on the 2,500-hectare Aerotropolis project in Bulacan.

Moreover, the advocate group CCNCI said that “climate justice” is an issue of social justice, as basic sectors are the proponents of environmental protection and sustainable production, a total contrast of capitalist exploitation and drstruction of land and marine resources.

Pamalakaya also recognized the efforts of College of Engineering Representative Paul Redillas and EMC² Fraternity who facilitated the group’s entry to the fair.

“This should be emulated by all university and college student councils, for their respective school fair to be a venue for marginalized sectors. More power to the student council, salute to the ‘iskolar ng Bayan’,” France ended./Stacy Ang


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading