Philippine polo team shares double bronze finish with Indonesia in 0-2 polo event– a first in the sport of polo (and possibly in any other sport)

on

After rains inundated his 30 hectare field which Congressman Mike Romero claims to be of world-class caliber, here we discovered a letter written by him, requesting for a “double bronze” prize for polo participants. Double bronze finishes in a competition which saw only four (4) contenders?

How strange that two countries, the Philippines and Indonesia fought for the bronze medal in the 0-2 polo event when both camps knew that Romero requested for a double bronze place anyway?

For the information of many, Romero hails himself as the “leader” of the Philippine polo team which competed against just three other countries– Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei. The Philippine polo team, previously led by industrialist Inigo Zobel, is an internationally recognized team.

Now, the team is being headed by Romero whose record performance as a polo player (zero rating) is, some say, as dismal as his performance as one of this country’s legislators.

The team took part in two (2) events: the 0-2 and the 4-6. A source told this writer that had it been that the Philippine polo team was managed properly, the team could have secured and won two precious gold medals in these two events.

What happened was Romero did some things which offended certain patrons of the sport, including Zobel, the only man recognized by the global polo sport as a legitimate one to represent Filipinos.

What led to Romero asking the SEAgames organizers to consider giving two bronze medal finishes to those who failed to snatch the gold medal win in the 0-2 match events? Well, the polo team which Romero led crumbled to Indonesia, who is the legitimate bronze medal winner. Good to know that the Philippines legitimately snatched a silver in the 4-6 event but no double bronze finishes for Brunei and Indonesia which succumbed to the strong games of Malaysians and Filipinos.

The Indonesians probably did not agree to share the bronze which the Bruneians won out of sheer self-respect. Imagine, playing for the bronze with another when you know that the possibility of awarding a double bronze finish looms? Stupid.

There is a saying that what is good for the goose is also good for the gander, right? In the SEAGAMES polo, this curiously does not apply. How humiliating!

 


Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Avatar photo
Filobserverhttp://filobserver.wordpress.com
FilObserver aims to be the top most in mind when it comes to Philippine and Asian news, culture, information and opinions.

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

MUST READ

Defunding Rail Maintenance: Keeping Today’s Trains Alive for Tomorrow’s...

Buhayin ang Lumang Tren By Paul Y. Chua, PhD One Metro Manila line still runs cars that first carried passengers in December 1999, nearly 27 years...

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER!

MAS PINABILIS NA ANG PAGBIYAHE SA VICTORY LINER! Mas madali at mas convenient na ang pagkuha ng bus tickets! Alamin kung paano gagawing mas mabilis at...

MC Taxi Riders Appeal to LTFRB amidst Overboarding Issue

MANILA, Philippines, October 22, 2026 — Motorcycle taxi riders are calling on the Marcos administration and transport regulatory bodies to provide those operating beyond...

China’s Wolf Warriors are Back. Beijing Should Recall Its...

China's ambassador to the Philippines has accomplished in a few sentences what years of Chinese public diplomacy have struggled to prevent: He has reinforced the perception that Beijing regards its smaller neighbors not as sovereign equals, but as countries expected to accommodate its growing military and economic power.

Beyond the 2027 Invasion Timeline: Diplomatic Isolation, Ontological Security,...

This paper challenges military-centered assessments of a possible People's Republic of China (PRC) operation against Taiwan by 2027, arguing that Beijing's calculations may depend not only on military readiness and economic costs but also on diplomatic recognition, international legitimacy, and political identity. It advances a conditional framework integrating ontological security theory, the Chinese sociological concept of mianzi (face), and recognition politics. The paper proposes that Taiwan's declining diplomatic recognition could strengthen Beijing's sovereignty narrative, create a perceived loss of face for Taiwan's governing authorities, and alter the political conditions under which Beijing considers coercive or military unification. Drawing on official PRC statements, U.S. security assessments, and international relations scholarship, the analysis develops three propositions concerning recognition, status vulnerability, and coercive decision-making. It argues that complete diplomatic isolation could represent a significant political threshold without necessarily eliminating Taiwan's international relationships or legitimizing the use of force. The paper contributes to cross-strait security studies by identifying diplomatic recognition as a potentially important condition that shapes Beijing's assessment of the political feasibility and costs of unification, beyond conventional materialist explanations.

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Current Ph

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading